Oregon Oxford Debate Essay

OREGON OXFORD DEBATE. Rules and Guidelines On Debate Prep bed byMa. Martha Manette A. Madrid, Ed.D. Professor marztmonetteyahoo.com 2. PropositionResolved That Parliamentary Form of Government Be Adopted 3. Format of DebateOxford-Oregon Type4. Three Speakers fromeach sideFirst favorable - inferential computer addressFirst ban -Interpellation of the first affirmative SpeakerFirst oppose -Constructive SpeechFirst Affirmative -Interpellation of the first negative speakerSecond Affirmative -Constructive SpeechSecond Negative -Interpellation of the second affirmativeSecond Negative -ConstructiveSecond Affirmative -Interpellation of the second negativeThird Affirmative -Constructive SpeechThird Negative -Interpellation of the third affirmativeThird Negative -Constructive SpeechThird Affirmative -Interpellation of the third negative 5. Three Speakers fromeach siderebutter of the group Captainof the Affirmative SideSUR- Rebuttal of the Team Captainof the Negative Side6. Duration Constru ctive Speech Minimum of five (5) and maximum of seven (7) minutesInterpellation Five (5) minutesRebuttal Speech Three (3) minutesSUR- Rebuttal Three (3) minutes 7. Issues for Debate A. Whether or non it is Necessary?(Necessity)B. Whether or not it is beneficial?(Beneficial)C. Whether or not it is hardheaded?(Practicability) 8. Criteria for JudgingA. Evidence 25%B. Delivery 30%C. Interpellation 30%D. Rebuttal &SUR-Rebuttal 15% 9. Criteria for Judging- The appraises, found on theirdiscretion, shall(a) have the authority todetermine who will be the BestSpeaker and Best Debater. Thewinning squad shall be determined bythe majority decision of the menu ofJudges. 10. Guides for Constructive SpeechSpeech sheaths of Constructive Speech maybeReading MethodMemory MethodExtemporaneousMix method of retentivity andconversational or dramatic 11. Guides for Constructive SpeechPoise, gestures, listening contact andvoice projection ar highlyrecommended. 12. Rules on Interpellation1. Que stions should primarily focused on argumentsdeveloped in the speech of your opponent. However,matters germane(predicate) and material to the proposition areadmissible.2. Questioner and opponent should treat each former(a) withcourtesy.3. Both speakers stand and face the audience during thequestion or Interpellation period.4. at once the questioninghas begun, neither the questionernor his opponent may consult a colleague.Consultationshould be done before but as quietly as likely . 13. Rules on Interpellation5. Questioners should ask brief and easily understandablequestion. reactions should equally be brief. flat questions resolventable by yes or no is allowed, however, opponent if hechoose, may qualify his answer why yes or why no.6. Questioner may not fill in off a reasonable and qualifyinganswer, but he may glow off a nervous receipt with a literary argumentsuch as a thank you that is enough information or your train is quite clear or Im satisfied.7. Questioner should not comment on the response of hisopponent.8. Your opponent may refuse to answer ambiguous, irrelevant orloaded questions by ask the questioner to rephrase or reformhis question. 14. Rules on Rebuttal SpeechA. Rebuttal speaker should point out clearlythe fallacies committed by his opponentstating clearly what particularly statement orargument constitute said fallacy.B.If not familiar with the fallacies of logic,the vier may riposte arguments directlyby stating what arguments or statement isincorrect or false. 15. Role of the ModeratorThe moderator of the debate has the followingduties1. To reveal the free involve the debate2. To rule on points of clarification about the screws or questions and answers do during theInterpellation and3. To see to it that the debate is orderly andfollows the rules of parliamentary procedures. 16. Role of the Timer1. To metre the speakers and debatersaccurately2. To give the speakers a one-minutewarning with the ringing of the bell oncebefore his/her age is up.3. To prevent the debaters from exceedingthe time allotted to them by ringing thebell twice.17. Tips on Interpellationand RebuttalCROSS interrogative sentenceA. The hide-examination period of a debate is a time when the person who is not going to speak coterminous in the constructive questions the person who has just finished speaking.B. Consider cross examination an information exchange period it is not the time to use play lawyer.18. CROSS EXAMINATION C. Cross examination may swear out six objectives 1. To clarify points 2. To expose errors 3. To obtain admissions 4. To setup arguments 5. To save planning time 6. To show the judge how cool you are so they penury to vote 19. CROSS EXAMINATION D. Most debaters tend to ignore the rate of good cross- examination. Remember, 30% of the entire debate is spent in cross-examination it should be a meaningful and essential part of the debate. If nothing else, debaters tendto dishonor the importance that cross-examinatio n may have on the judge. E. Cross-examination will indicate to the judge just how sharp and spontaneous the debaters are. Invisible bias will evermore occur in a debate rhythm method and adjudicate would invariably like the sharpest team to win. Good, effective cross- examination of the opponents can play an all of the essence(p)(p) psychological role in winning the ballot of the judge.20. CROSS EXAMINATION F. Be dynamic. Have questions and be ready to go, answer questions actively and with confidence whenever you can. The image you project will be very important to the audience/judge. This is the one opportunity the audience/judge has to compare you with opponents side-by-side. 21. GUIDELINES FOR ASKINGQUESTIONS1. Ask a unforesightful Q designed to get a short A2. Indicate the object of your Q3. Dont telegraph your argument, dont shed light on it too obvious.4. Dont ask Q they wont answerproperly.So, we win, proper(a)?22. GUIDELINES FOR ASKINGQUESTIONS5. stick Q seem impo rtant, even if it isjust an attempt to clarify.6. Politeness is a must(prenominal) emphasize thedifference if they are rude.7. Approach things from a non-obviousdirection. Then trap them.8. mark off your flow/notes as to what youwant to question them about.23. GUIDELINES FOR ASKINGQUESTIONS9. Avoid open ended Qs unless you aresure they are clueless.10. Face the judge/audience, not youropponent.11. CX answers must be coordinated intoyour arguments made during a speech. 24. GUIDELINES FOR ANSWERINGQUESTIONS1. Concise A.2. Refer to somewhatthing you have alreadysaid whenever possible. This is safe.3. Answer based on your position in thedebate so far. Keep options open.4. Dont make promises of what you oryour first mate will do later. 25. GUIDELINES FOR ANSWERINGQUESTIONS5. Qualify your answers.6. Be willing to exchange documentsread into the debate.7. Answer only relevant questions.8. Address the judge. 26. GUIDELINES FOR ANSWERINGQUESTIONS9. Try and not answer vatical Q. Ifthe y demand, say you will give ahypothetical A.10. Signal each other, dont tag-team.11. Dont sayI dont know,sayI am notsure at this time. 27. REBUTTALSA. Most debaters, coaches, and judges would agree that rebuttals are the most difficult and yet the most important parts of the debate.B. Not only is there less time deep down each speech, but each debater has to sort through all of the issues to determine which ones are the most important onesC. What a debater does or does not do in rebuttals will decide who wins the debate. Very fewer debaters (especially beginners) can hope to extend everything thathappened in the constructive speeches.28. REBUTTALSD. Debaters dont have to do that and just because a team may have dropped a point or an argument is not an automatic reason to vote against that team.E. What matters is the type of argument that is extended or dropped in rebuttals-this will determine the achiever of the round. 29. REBUTTALSThink about these four issues when rebuttalshapp en1. Which arguments have more weight at theend of the round?2. Which outcomes (disads, counter plans)are more likely given lots of internal cogitate?3. What about time frame-what happensfirst?4. What about the quality of evidence? 30. REBUTTALSHere are some other helpful hints1. Avoid repetition. Dont just repeat yourconstructive arguments. Beat the other teamsarguments and tell the judge why your argumentsare better.2. Avoid passing ships. Dont avoid what theother team said. You must clash directly withtheir responses.3. Avoid reading evidence only. You must beexplaining and telling the judge why these issueswin the debate. 31. REBUTTALS4. Avoid rereading evidence that has alreadybeen read in constructive. You can makereference to it by referring to it, but dont re-read it.5. Avoid lumping and dumping.Dont try togo for everything. You bank make 12responses to each argument in a few minutes.6. Be organized. Dont flip-flop from issue toissue at random. Be specific and logical abo utwinning issues.32. REBUTTALS7. Dont be a blabbering motor mouth. Speakquickly but not beyond your ability. If you speaktoo fast, you will stumble and not get through asmuch.8. Dont whine to the judge about fairness or whatthe other team might have done that you think isunethical. Make responses and beat them.9. Dont make new arguments. You can read newevidence but you cant run new disadvantages ortopicality responses. You are limiting to extendingthe positions laid out in the constructive speeches. 33. REBUTTALS10. Use signposting. Make sure the judge knowswhere you are on the flow sheet. This is not the timeto lose the judge on the flow.11. Use issue packages. Organize your argumentsinto issue packages. Choose arguments which youwant to win. Dont go for everything. Extend thosearguments that you need to win.12. Cross-apply arguments. If you dropped anargument in a prior speech that you think wasimportant dont act like your losing. Cross-applyarguments you made somewhere else in t he debate toanswer it.