Answers to Prompt Questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Answers to Prompt Questions - show ExampleHowever, the idea of Plato that knowledge is inclined more on the non-sensible Forms contradicts his own metaphysical claim that Forms would cypher upon the interpretation of the philosophers works. According to Irwin (154), Platos epistemological claim states that these Forms be inaccessible to the senses. While Plato evince that his metaphysical claim is the Form of F has properties that no sensible F can invite. However, according to Silverman, epistemology is nearly the acquisition of knowledge and what knowledge is (Silverman). On the otherwise hand, metaphysics is anything which can be thought and give tongue to to be. unity cannot fully endorse Platos theory of Forms as there argon difference in interpretations and opinions of the said work. Not all knowledge is being considered as knowledge by the philosopher. It is only those people who have philosophical thoughts or the non-sensible ideas which are being considered as know ledgeable. This proposition does not apply to those who are exerting more on their physical capabilities. Acquiring skills can still be considered as knowledgeable by other people or group of thinkers, but not Plato. The idea quite discriminate skill workers which are very much part of the society especially with regards to the economic and workforce aspect. Though what the skilled are doing is sensible, their actions are still knowledge because they are thinking what to do next on a arrogant manner. In this aspect, the famous line I think, therefore I am by Rene Descartes can take after into context (Irwin, 148-55 Silverman Russell, 516). Plato makes people seem that knowledge is unachievable which is contradicted by Descartes. According to the latter, there is no consummate knowledge. If the idea proposed by Descartes would be considered, one can be considered knowledgeable without the need to measure up to forms or criterions. Descartes may not have proven to everyone the hum ans of God however, he had proclaimed its being in his works. The author stated that the knowledge which a person acquires is from a supreme being, which is God. This is supported by the statement But after I have discovered that God exists, seeing I overly at the same time observed that all things depend on him, that he is no deceiver, and indeed inferred that all which I cookly and distinctly perceive is of necessity true although I no lifelong attend to the grounds of a judgment, no opposite reason can be alleged qualified to lead me to doubt of its truth, provided only I remember that I once possessed a clear and distinct comprehension of it. (Descartes & Veitch, 109) There might be no concrete evidence to prove the existence of God. Nevertheless, knowing within the self that a supreme being exists is enough to convince the self and prophesy about its existence or truthfulness to others. Though there is neither a concrete detail nor a distinct indication of Gods existenc e, Descartes proposed his readers to meditate and reach within the self to be freed from the doubt that is covering them from recognizing the presence of a higher power. In most if not all of the publications attributed to Descartes, there is always an indication towards the existence and acknowledgement to the things created and attributed to the power and creation of God as the overbearing Being and higher power (Russell, 515-20 Descartes & Veitch, 103-10). There will always be people who would be sceptic upon the idea of God