Sound Vs. Silence :: essays research papers

The most apparent difference between genus Dracula and Nosferatu is that hotshot was make while film was still without sound-at least dialogue-and the other was non. This difference, though not a revelation in itself, leads to a great number of often much in-depth opposes that deserve discussion. In making a silent film, a director must rely on sight-and a certain beat of text-to portray to the audience his intended emotional, and intellectual reaction. As a endpoint of this, the director is not able to go into in-depth character development with the similar kind of resources as a director of film that is not silent. In the case of Nosferatu, this leads to a very limited number of characters have all kind of depth whatever. This is not to say that both character does not have about him or herself a certain image, or that every character does not extract a certain emotion from the audience. It is obviously to say that a great number of characters in Nosferatu use scarce ly image to achieve their desired effect. For example, in Dracula, if one were to see Dracula walking down the street, an adverse reaction would be somewhat illfounded. removed of his clothes, Dracula is a normal looking person. In Nosferatu, however, Dracula is more or less a freak. The end result of this is the audience having the aforesaid(prenominal) image of Dracula in both movies, one achieved this through broad dialogue, and one simply through the appearance of a character. Another example, in Dracula, the first character that is given any kind of development whatsoever is Renfield, and throughout the movie, Renfield is transformed first to a blood sucking savage, and thus slowly returned to a character with a heart, and a little pungency of compassion. However, in Nosferatu, Renfield is already the blood sucking savage, cooped up in the zestful bin, eating bugs when the movie starts, and the extent of his role seems to be nothing more than to provide more insight into the nature of Dracula.Perhaps the most interesting contrast between the two movies is that although they are based on the same novel, their yarn lines do not coincide. This is apparent in the beginning when in Dracula, Renfield is the one who travels to Transylvania, whereas in Nosferatu, behind Harker is the one who travels to Transylvania. It is not explicitly clear in Dracula who the owner of the property that Dracula purchases is however, in Nosferatu, it is clear that John Harker is the owner, and his trip to Transylvainia is for the purpose of selling the property to Dracula.